Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09911293"

See other formats


United States Patent and Trademark Office 



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
United States Patent and Trademark Office 
Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS 
P.O. Box 1450 

Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 
www.uspto.gov 



APPLICATION NO. 


FILING DATE 


FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 


ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 


CONFIRMATION NO. 


09/911,293 


07/23/2001 


Sanghoon Sull 




•2894 



57692 7590 

JONES DAY 

222 E.41ST STREET 

NEW YORK, NY 10017 



02/05/2008 



EXAMINER 



RUTLEDGE, AMELIA L 



ART UNIT 



PAPER NUMBER 



2176 



MAIL DATE 



DELIVERY MODE 



02/05/2008 PAPER 

Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding* 

The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. 



PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) 



Interview Summary 


Application No. 

09/911,293 


Applicant(s) 
SULL ET AL 


Examiner 

Amelia Rutledge 


Art Unit 

2176 





All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel): 
(1) Amelia Rutledge - USPTO . (3) 



(2) Edward Pencoske - applicant's representative . (4) . 

Date of Interview: 31 January 2008 . 

Type: a)K Telephonic b)D Video Conference 

c)D Personal [copy given to: 1)D applicant 2)Q applicant's representative] 

Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: d)D Yes e)IEI No. 
If Yes, brief description: . 

Claim(s) discussed: 89. 

Identification of prior art discussed: Swenson . 

Agreement with respect to the claims f)D was reached. g)E3 was not reached. h)D N/A. 



Substance of Interview including description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was 
reached, or any other comments: Compared the features of the claimed invention to Swenson, discussed possible 
ways in which the claims could be amended to overcome Swenson . 

(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims 
allowable, if available, must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments that would render the claims 
allowable is available, a summary thereof must be attached.) 

THE FORMAL WRITTEN REPLY TO THE LAST OFFICE ACTION MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE 
INTERVIEW. (See MPEP Section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT IS 
GIVEN A NON-EXTENDABLE PERIOD OF THE LONGER OF ONE MONTH OR THIRTY DAYS FROM THIS 
INTERVIEW DATE, OR THE MAILING DATE OF THIS INTERVIEW SUMMARY FORM, WHICHEVER IS LATER, TO 
FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. See Summary of Record of Interview 
requirements on reverse side or on attached sheet. 



Examiner Note: You must sign this form unless it is an 
Attachment to a signed Office action. 



Examiner's signature 




U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 

PTOL-413 (Rev. 04-03) 



Interview Summary 



Paper No. 20080131